What began as a Carte Blanche insert has been extended into a Crime & Investigation special to be broadcast round the world.
Tonight (28 April) the
Crime and Investigation channel premieres The Ellen Pakkies Story. At 20h35.
Produced and directed by filmmaker Michael Duffet, the show unpacks the harrowing events surrounding Ellen Pakkies who murdered her son Abie in 2007.
The show mixes dramatic re-enactments with one-on-one interviews with Ellen herself, her lawyer in her trial, the prosecutor, the judge and other witnesses and experts.
It also presents the events that led up to his murder, as well as what followed afterwards: the court case and the court's decision to set Ellen free.
The key evidence:
21-year old Abie was addicted to crystal meth, also known as Tik in the Western Cape.
It turned him aggressive, violent and uncontrollable.
He threatened Ellen to the point where she had to lock herself in a room to escape him, in fear for her life.
Ellen Pakkies at a screening of the documentary in Cape Town recently. The show was screened for members of the press, those involved in drug rehabilitation and other interested parties.
He stole her possessions, her money, everything she had.
She had restraining orders taken out against him, which didn't restrain him. The police didn't enforce them. He kept coming back.
His father wasn't around to protect her, no-one supported her.
On 12 September 2007, Abie came home drugged and fell asleep. She strangled him with a rope.
She then went to work. After which she confessed.
Ellen during the screening of the footage of the dramatic re-enactment of the murder. With her is her friend Venecia Orgill, who's also in the documentary. Her son hanged himself, high on Tik. The two met during Ellen's trial. Ellen, too upset to watch further, left the screening room shortly after.
In court, Ellen's lawyer argued that she was a victim, driven to the unthinkable, with nowhere else to turn.
The court ruled that Abie's addiction had driven her to psychological trauma and the murder and gave a verdict of Not Guilty.
She took a life, it was murder - of her own son. Was it the correct verdict?
Her life was threatened, she had nowhere to turn to protect herself or get help. It was him or her. Was it the correct verdict?
Are there extenuating circumstances where it's okay to kill? What do you think?